Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ardel B Caneday's avatar

Earlier today, I had an occasion to refer readers to Abraham Kuyper's 1869 lecture titled "Uniformity: The Curse of Modern Life," where he comments, "an attempt is being made to transform the two sexes, masculine and feminine, into a neutral hybrid of the two." In the same lecture he comments on the ubiquitous movement toward uniformity of everything, including architecture. Here he summarizes these issues: "So here we are. Everything has to be equalized and leveled; all diversity must be whittled down. Differences in architectural style must go. Age differences must go. Gender differences must go. Differences in dress must go. Differences in language must do. Indeed, what doesn't have to go if this drive toward uniformity succeeds? For what I have said so far is barely a beginning of the indictment against uniformity."

Annie Holmquist nails the issue Kuyper raised more than 150 years ago. She gets it

Expand full comment
Scott Smithwick's avatar

Excellent article and I was pleasantly surprised to hear Tucker and Brand discuss architecture in the middle of what otherwise a conversation about anything/everything else. As an architect myself in this era, they and you, hit on something that I had struggled with but hadn’t pieced together...chalk it up to being too close to the industry 😏. We have a term for a lot of these architects today - ones that design many of these horrendous buildings - we call them “black cape architects”...ones who have lofty opinions of their own work, while looking down their noses at the rest of us, which now becomes evident through the buildings they design...buildings that don’t function and figuratively look down on their occupants. This is especially true of government buildings whether they be federal, state or local and especially schools...so many sad, oppressive school buildings around and our kids suffer from early ages.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts