Picking a school for one’s child is a huge responsibility. The subjects taught and the manner in which they’re taught – not to mention the learning environment in the classroom – can all make a huge impact upon whether that child is successful as an adult. So how do parents best evaluate a school’s quality?
New research shows that parents overwhelmingly rely on one indicator to measure school quality: graduation rates. As the chart below from EdChoice shows, 61% of parents believe graduation rates tell a lot about school quality.
While relying on graduation rates to show a school’s quality may have worked once upon a time, other research indicates that graduation rates no longer give parents an accurate picture of what’s happening in the classroom. In fact, the last five to ten years of data show that high and steady graduation rates may actually be hiding some serious academic decline, leaving students unprepared to face the challenges of college-level work.
“[S]tudents’ college readiness has reached historic lows, according to several metrics,” a recent EdWeek article explains, “including the lowest scores in 30 years on the ACT and declining scores on the SAT, the two primary standardized tests used for college admissions. And yet, more than 4 in 5 high school seniors report feeling ‘very’ or ‘mostly’ academically prepared for college, according to a 2023 ACT nationwide survey.”
College professors see this decline firsthand, EdWeek says, one professor explaining that today’s students can only handle around 10 pages of a reading assignment, and may not always understand it, whereas students a decade or more ago could handle a 30-page reading assignment.
Many chalk up this academic decline to the grade inflation which happened during the COVID pandemic; yet research shows that grade inflation was happening before that, says EdWeek, with an ACT study showing student GPA increases since 2010. This same pattern is reflected in the below chart from The Economist, showing high school graduation accelerating around that same time, while SAT scores went the opposite direction.
Data from the Minnesota Department of Education shows this pattern is happening in our own state. The graduation rate has remained fairly steady statewide for the last five years, around 83%.
Yet when we look at statewide reading proficiency rates for 10th grade students (the last grade tested before graduation), we see that only half of Minnesota’s students are meeting standards.
Statewide proficiency rates for 11th grade math are even worse, with only one-third of students meeting standards.
That may be true statewide, many of us would say, but schools in MY district are okay. Graduation rates are high and students are learning!
Sadly, this statewide trend carries through to the district level. Indeed, drilling deeper shows that many local districts tout graduation rates running around 90% or better, while only around half of students in those districts are proficient in reading or math. That means that those straight A’s on your child’s report card may be a false front, a Potemkin Village if you will, signaling that everything is fine with him academically, while in reality, nothing could be further from the truth.
Why do schools do this? EdWeek suggests that school districts support grade inflation because it makes “grading more equitable and boost[s] students’ motivation.”
But there could be other factors at play. Consider that schools are increasingly bogged down by administrative bloat. Policies handed down from above—such as restrictions on discipline in the classroom—make it difficult for teachers to teach. If teachers’ hands are tied, then of course it would be easy to just inflate grades so they can keep pushing students through the school machine and not be blamed for failure to teach a student to read in an out-of-control classroom.
Unfortunately, this administrative bloat only promises to grow worse. As a state legislator recently told me, the Minnesota Legislature is increasingly pushing bills making education mandates for schools. Such bills remove control from local school districts and boards, placing it in the hands of the state at large. The more teachers are forced to focus on these top-down mandates, the less they’ll be able to effectively teach our children.
What do high graduation rates and low academic proficiency mean for our children? It means that we’re sending them to college unprepared. That lack of preparation will make college difficult for them, and may make them drop out, leaving them with mountains of debt and no degree to show for it. In other words, we’re setting them up to fail.
Many advance grade inflation as a kindness—a method to help students feel better about themselves and their achievements. But setting them up for failure isn’t kindness; it’s cruelty.
If we’re fine with setting our students up to fail, then we should continue with the status quo. But if we’re not okay with that, then it’s time for parents to pursue educational freedom, seeking and supporting policies such as Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) which make it possible for parents to take the dollars allocated to their children and use them at schools which won’t just pass students along the grade conveyor belt to boost their self-esteem or fulfill some administrative demand.
And above all, don’t believe every graduation rate you see.
—
This article is republished from OAKmn.org under a creative commons license.
Image Credit: Picryl
I'm sorely tempted to say "Them dang Lutherans!" when it comes to Minnesota's descent into woke-Limbo, since back in the 60s when I was resident there, one could already sense the 'Kumbaya' spirit perfusing insidiously through those northern states (NDAK, SDAK, MINN, etc.), not atypically related to the extreme liberalism that inherently permeates Martin Luther's largest American colonies. But I won't.
Clearly, grade virtue-signaling tactics (such as this you mention here) to 'help student self-esteem' is and always has been an utter failure when it comes to producing intelligent, critically-reflective and academically competent students who are fully prepared to engage the challenges of life. I’ve no personal doubt that both Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin are well aware of this, as they watch our struggle on the sidelines and rub their hands with glee over the prospect of Marxist Communism finally ‘ending’ what it began, so long ago.
Of course, it's also no secret that the radical (Marcusian-Marxist) ideologues, who are ultimately to blame for persistent 'dumbing-down' efforts in America society, wish to destroy the foundations of our democratic republic. The best way to do this is (as Thomas Harrington recently opined in an INTELLECTUAL TAKEOUT article) to turn the 'simple folk' into compliant, easily influenced leftist sycophants who will follow the Neo-Marxist Pied Pipers down their chosen path unquestioningly.
In a nation in which Orwellian logic increasingly dominates thought, a nation in which night is day and true is false, bleeding hearts who feel such a perverse need to demonstrate destructive extremes of academic compassion (e.g. grade-inflation, et al) are often the same ones who deliver hundreds of large pizzas to homeless street people and de-fund law enforcement agencies because police are all brutes. Between these befuddled, incredibly (albeit well-meaning) naive older people, and the radically nihilistic young idealists, those champions of critical thinking (such as yourself, Jeff Minick and many others) have their job truly cut out for them in trying to address problems such as you refer to in our schools.
As the admirable but always fragile ‘Great American Experiment’ in individual freedom draws ever-closer to its final act, I hold out no great hopes for our ultimate national survival. After all, the great mass of humanity is so volatile and chaotic in nature, (as history repeatedly demonstrates, and as Gustav leBon pointed out in the late 1800s) no truly democratic system has ever lasted more than a couple of hundred years. By all means, fight the good fight Annie and good on ya’ for your efforts to stem the tide of our pending doom, but I fear it’s starting to look like a lost cause.
Arthur Schopenhauer and Louis-Ferdinand Céline perhaps said it best, when it comes to the triumph of ignorance and blind ego over reasoned wisdom and enlightened intent, but then, who bothers to read philosophy anymore, eh?
What was it our 81-year-old genius of a Founding Father Ben Franklin said in his 1787 address to Washington, at the Constitutional Convention: “In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no form of government, but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered; and believe further, that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government.”
Annie, a fine article. Also, Kalikiano Kalei, your comments offer some fine insights into this issue of education, its failings, and the consequences for our culture and society, many of which we're already seeing.
Certainly, Kalikiano, I understand as well your pessimism about the future. Many other good-hearted people I know agree with you, as I myself do on my "rough days." But in my case, I can only go on fighting "the good fight" to "stem this tide of our impending doom." If for no other reason, I have too many grandchildren to call it quits. Besides, if we are to lose this war, for me it's better to go down sword in hand.
Written in haste but with admiration for both of you and your writing....